We asked Miguel Martínez Tomey, one of the project coordinators, what we have learned so far, and this is what he answered
1.
It is a working tool, not a political goal.
Rural proofing helps design better legislation by identifying the potential impacts of decisions on rural areas and supporting the development of alternatives. However, it is just one of many tools in a broader rural policy strategy. It does not set political goals for rural areas, but it loses its purpose if policymakers lack them.
2.
It is a legislative and administrative discipline.
Legislating and governing with a "rural lens" requires an initial political push—often through a law—to be implemented. However, for it to take root and evolve, it must become an ordinary working habit.
3.
"Ve despacio, que tengo prisa" (Spanish proverb: "Go slow, because I’m in a hurry").
It can be introduced as a mandatory requirement, but its acceptance, integration, and development demand time and sustained effort over many years. This process requires dedicated personnel, sufficient resources, and a compelling narrative (a positive story) to ensure that those involved remain convinced of its purpose and value, preventing it from becoming a mere bureaucratic formality.
4.
Four. It is based on data, evidence, and shared knowledge.
Rural proofing must combine quantitative knowledge (statistics and studies specifically designed to accurately interpret rural realities) with qualitative insights (gathered through interactions with rural stakeholders, local administrations, and experts). This knowledge must also be shared across departments.
5.
It creates and establishes a valuable governance intelligence.
Sustained implementation, continuous monitoring and evaluation, ongoing adaptation, and the constant expansion of its knowledge base all contribute to increasing its effectiveness and efficiency over time. This turns rural proofing into a valuable governance asset for public authorities.
